Is my extreme honesty hurting myself or helping others?

Last week I posted a revised list of my flaws and shortcomings. It was the third time I have revised and posted the list. You can read about the reason I began writing and posting the list here if you are curious.

Every time I post this list, I receive responses from readers that fall into three categories:

A tiny percentage of the respondents criticize me based upon the list, essentially using it as a means of attacking my character.

The rest of the responses, and the great majority of them, are split evenly along two lines:

About half of my readers question the wisdom of listing all my shortcomings and flaws for the world to see. They point out that many of the items on the list make me look quite rotten, and as a result, this is not the kind of thing I should be sharing with the world, especially if I want readers to continue buying my books.

The other half thank me for sharing the list, expressing appreciation for my willingness to be so honest and finding comfort in the knowledge that their flaws are not unique. As one reader said, “It’s such a relief to know that I’m not the only person in the world who can be such a stinker.”

At its heart, this is a question of sharing versus oversharing. With the exception of the few who use my list in order to attack me or make assumptions about my overall character, the vast majority of the readers  who respond to the list seem to genuinely care about my wellbeing. Half of them simply believe that sharing this kind of information could hurt me, while the other half find the sharing of this information helpful to them.

As a result, I am left wondering how to feel.

Should I be concerned about what people (and potential readers) will think about me after reading the list, or should I be pleased that my list is helping people?

I’m not sure.

This entry was posted in Quandry. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Is my extreme honesty hurting myself or helping others?

  1. Ann Kingman says:

    I’m curious of the two responses (ignoring the attackers,obviously) correlate at all to people who know you in person vs. those who don’t. Because I think that could make a huge difference. I’ll be honest, even though I *loved* your list because it showed humility and the ability to laugh at yourself, if I didn’t know you already, I don’t know if I would have perceived those undertones.

    On the other hand, anyone who has read more than a handful of your blog posts would already be aware of some of your unique personality traits (I won’t call them flaws).

    I know this isn’t helpful, but that’s what you get from me before I’ve had coffee (which I know is something you don’t “get,” but hey, that’s my flaw).

  2. matthew says:

    No, it is helpful. Unfortunately, almost all of the respondents were people who I don’t know in person.

    My actual friends tend to ignore me.

    If I had to guess, I think the people who have known me longer, or at least communicate with me more often were more likely to have expressed concern about the post, and those who rarely (if ever) communicate with me were more likely to have expressed appreciation.

    But I can’t be sure if I’m judging this correctly, either.

    And I don’t think coffee is your flaw. If you talked about it and your need for it incessantly and with gratuitous punctuation, then it might be a flaw. It’s merely a beverage in your world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>